Whilst this case may be of limited legal interest it is certainly colourful enough in detail to be of general interest. In short, butler and housekeeper sacked after serving roast chicken to property tycoon at 6pm instead of 7pm. Tribunal still ongoing.
Press reporting of these cases (taking into account the paper in question) always tends to focus on the sensational rather than the relevant. By means of illustration, before being told any of the facts of the case, we learn that the property tycoon is married to a former swimwear model 18 years his junior and later, that she was once voted ‘sexiest woman in South Africa’. And that is relevant, why/how???