This case at the EAT illustrates how Polkey can operate to reduce the Claimant’s award after a dismissal is found to be unfair on procedural grounds. In this case, the defect in process was not considering all available suitable alternative employment. However, based on the evidence before the Tribunal (which included that the Claimant rejected three jobs that were discussed with him), the Tribunal concluded that there was a 75% chance the Claimant would not have taken the job he was not offered even if he has been offered it. Accordingly his unfair dismissal award was reduced by 75%.