If you didn't find what you were looking for, try a new search!
Welcome back to another case of the week. Last week our newsletter covered a professor who suffered victimisation, harassment and direct discrimination for expressing her views at a Women’s Place UK talk, mass redundancy at Port Talbot and DPD learning that it’s not just disgruntled employees that can be disloyal when its own AI chatbot stated [...]
Happy Friday everyone and thank you for joining us for another case law update. For those of you that missed our last case of the week about an upcoming change to flexible working requests, you can find that here. This week we're looking at a case straight from the Supreme Court which considers whether an [...]
For those of you that missed last week’s newsletter you can have a browse through it at your leisure here. In it we discussed how Gary Lineker’s tweets might have constituted a protected philosophical belief, the issues caused by a disgruntled ex-employee of Twitter and how daylight savings time can affect your health. Our last [...]
“Once they enter the workplace, the British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music.” No this is not a policy from [...]
After a brief break, your case law update returns and will resume normal service of weekly updates henceforth (cheers/groans). Going all the way back to May, our last case law update looked at tribunal procedure, specifically dismissing a claim and awarding costs in the event a party does not attend the hearing. Whilst we have [...]
Wilson Barca LLP & Barca & Rajananth v Shirin Ms Shirin, the Clamant, was a 50 year old paralegal for Wilson Barca LLP, the First Respondent, a law firm specialising primarily in family law. The Second Respondent, Richard Barca, was a senior partner at the First Respondent. There was also a Third Respondent, Rajananth, the [...]
Another Friday is upon us which means it is time for another case law update. A look at some recent judgments showed some very technical and convoluted cases which would frankly make for boring reading. Given this week’s easing of the lockdown restrictions was confusing enough – does anyone else feel that if Boris Johnson [...]
The question this week is: Can a misunderstood termination date justify an extension of a Claimant’s limitation date? Is it sensible to appeal a decision on the above to the Court of Appeal? Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy Mr Brophy, the Claimant, was dismissed by Lowri Beck Services, the Respondent, over the telephone on [...]
This week we are looking at tribunal procedure and limitation dates. The case is actually one we have covered when it was a mere Employment Tribunal claim, since then the employer has appealed the decision in both the EAT and Court of Appeal. Limitation dates are the final date a Claimant has to commence ACAS [...]
Disclaimer PJH Law makes no representations, warranties, or assurances as to the accuracy, currency or completeness of the content contain on this website or any sites linked to this site. Limitation Of Liability The materials at this site are provided "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any [...]
