This month, a noteworthy case involved Cullingford v Secretary of State for Justice. The claimant, a County Court Bailiff, was diagnosed with cancer, making her eligible for disability protections under the Equality Act. She requested to bring an emotional support dog to work to help with her mental health. However, after a colleague reported seeing the dog in her vehicle, she was informed that the dog wasn’t a guide dog and therefore wasn’t allowed to accompany her.
After grievances and appeal meetings, the claimant resigned and filed claims for harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The Tribunal reviewed the claim and found that the adjustments requested did not place her at a substantial disadvantage, as required under the Act.
This case highlights the importance of a causal link between a claimant’s disability and the requested adjustment. A diagnosis of cancer, for example, would not impose the same obligations as a disability like blindness. This distinction is essential for potential claimants to consider.
If you or someone you know is dealing with similar issues at work, please reach out to a member of our team for support.
Leave A Comment